According to the Food Marketing Institute, the U.S. Senate recently rejected the so-called Paycheck Fairness Act (S. 3200) by a vote of 52 yeas to 47 nays."> SENATE REJECTS PAYCHECK FAIRNESS ACT

SENATE REJECTS PAYCHECK FAIRNESS ACT


- Friday, June 15, 2012



Home

According to the Food Marketing Institute, the U.S. Senate recently rejected the so-called Paycheck Fairness Act (S. 3200) by a vote of 52 yeas to 47 nays.  The bill that was sponsored by Senator Barbara Mikulski (D-MD) needed 60 votes in order for the Senate to invoke cloture and vote on passage.  S. 3220 sought to reduce salary differentials between male and female employees by strengthening remedies against gender-based wage discrimination.  S, 3220 would have made supermarket employers more susceptible to costly lawsuits if they use salary differentials based on factors, such as prevailing economic conditions, profitability of a store, store location, an individual’s productivity, education and work experience.  In a letter sent to the entire Senate, FMI stated among other things S. 3220 is not needed because individuals are already protected from gender-based salary discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Pay Act of 1963.  Even though prospects for approval of S. 3220 were unfavorable, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) forced a vote on the bill for purely political purposes.  According to FMI, it is highly unlikely that the Paycheck Fairness Act will be brought back to the Senate floor for further consideration this year.

Absolute News Manager: news publishing software and web content management system by Xigla Software

SENATE REJECTS PAYCHECK FAIRNESS ACT


- Friday, June 15, 2012



This article has been moved here